I'm so confused….. so many talking about his 'old' works being better…. but then in the same stride dissing the new comics…… are y'all under the impression that the "marginally edited version of the same image" sets are his 'old' work? Did y'all forget that he started with fetishy comics before he started doing those 'sets'? The inflation, egg laying, ahegao faces, and such were, at least in my view, his 'old stuff' since that is back when his style was a bit….. less refined, and always a comic. These new comics are basically 'throwbacks' to his old work…..
Honestly I remember when he started doing these sets more regularly and everyone complained that he (as well as many other artists doing the same thing) was being lazy. Oh how the times have changed, lol.
Seriously though…. when everyone is talking about his 'old' work, are you talking about the image sets, or the comics that preceded them? While pedantic, I think it may be helpful to define what works we're talking about. Pic related being his 'old/older' works, pics like >>125
being his 'new' work. And >>6517
being something along the lines of "throwback" work, reminiscent of his old work, but imo, better drawn and cleaner.