I remember someone on Tubmlr once edited those Bebop and Rocksteady pages, but I doubt that survived the purge.
I never saw those, but might be interesting (and conducive to the interests of this thread) if they were flaccid, at least most of the time. I've seen fan-made nude edits before, but usually they're huge and often messy erections that don't even fit the context or mood of the scene.
One of the things that makes permanudity so attractive is if it does not seem like the characters are actively trying to be porn for some audience to watch. It helps if, despite not wearing clothes, they don't seem "exposed," if that makes sense, because what they're (not) wearing just isn't relevant to them and they have not been culturally groomed to be ashamed or self-conscious of their own bodies. Instead, they're just being their honest candid everyday selves, up to and including sex, but in any event are not trying to prove anything to anyone else. They seem authentically comfortable and confident in their own skin.
Art by Cooner. In the case of this version of Bebop and Rocksteady, it's not necessarily that they never had body shame in the past, but have chosen to completely banish it from their lives. And when it seems clear that it's simply not relevant to them, then they no longer even seem exposed. Honestly, it's rather strange that these turtles care that B&R are naked, considering they're not wearing clothes either, so it's really not that different except maybe that B&R's junk is visible and the turtles' isn't.
Those are some nice FurryRevolution pics, thanks. There's a Patreon thread dedicated to him here…http://boards.barachan.org/ptr/res/4069.html
…if you'd like to contribute to it. It could use a lot of love. Thanks in advance. :)
Are there any real tribal photos like OP's pic? A lot of these seem very vanilla honestly.
A fetish is not always, by definition, a hardcore thing. Sometimes it's about how imagery complements what the brain already imagines - fetishes wouldn't be fetishes unless they pushed someone's buttons for whatever reason.
And what makes this a "controversial" fetish (hence on the /alt/ board) is more the question of whether photography of stone age tribal peoples should be considered exploitative. I remember, on previous bara image boards that dealt with this question, that there was a decision/consensus that if it's already a public photograph and there are no obvious underage people in it, then it's fine.
This is not a tribal photograph, but comes from "Natural Man Photos" by photographer Sherwin Carlqvist. Men in natural surroundings, all without modern tattoos, shaved body hair, tanlines or even circumcisions - as primeval as can be managed.